<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stats on Theme Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/</link>
	<description>A tri-annual 48 hour solo game development competition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oreganik</title>
		<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-60640</link>
		<dc:creator>Oreganik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/?p=154465#comment-60640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Johnfn, actually, I do worry about it!  =D  I thought along the same lines, and included the Round of each theme entry on the sheet for that reason. At the moment, I can&#039;t come up with some sort of formula to adjust for that. But I plan to in the future.

Also, the spreadsheet is open to the public, so anybody can plug in formulas if they like. =)

Thanks for the suggestion!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Johnfn, actually, I do worry about it!  =D  I thought along the same lines, and included the Round of each theme entry on the sheet for that reason. At the moment, I can&#8217;t come up with some sort of formula to adjust for that. But I plan to in the future.</p>
<p>Also, the spreadsheet is open to the public, so anybody can plug in formulas if they like. =)</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnfn</title>
		<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-60445</link>
		<dc:creator>johnfn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/?p=154465#comment-60445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoy this. :D

One thing to note is that +1/0/-1 votes are not objective!! They are relative to how good the rest of the themes are. Previously themes that didn&#039;t have the most +1s in their round have won the overall thing. This is probably because they had a tougher round with tougher opponents. That kind of throws a wrench in the calculations. Maybe you don&#039;t want to worry about it :p]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy this. <img src='http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One thing to note is that +1/0/-1 votes are not objective!! They are relative to how good the rest of the themes are. Previously themes that didn&#8217;t have the most +1s in their round have won the overall thing. This is probably because they had a tougher round with tougher opponents. That kind of throws a wrench in the calculations. Maybe you don&#8217;t want to worry about it :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oreganik</title>
		<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-60440</link>
		<dc:creator>Oreganik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/?p=154465#comment-60440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a new qualitative measurement, based on the Internet Movie Database. ^_^  Searching for the entry name gives us Exact and Partial matches, which are a decent measurement of how &quot;alluring&quot; the idea behind the entry is, and how much &quot;punch&quot; it has.

Looking at past data (I&#039;m up to LD 21), the IMDB score, and the theme / mechanic / concept summary above, I think it&#039;s going to be -very- tight for Survive (first) and Abandoned (second), with Afterlife maybe coming in third.

If I&#039;m right, nobody cares, even me. But, what the hell. I&#039;ll give myself one extra beer after I submit my game if I get anywhere close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new qualitative measurement, based on the Internet Movie Database. ^_^  Searching for the entry name gives us Exact and Partial matches, which are a decent measurement of how &#8220;alluring&#8221; the idea behind the entry is, and how much &#8220;punch&#8221; it has.</p>
<p>Looking at past data (I&#8217;m up to LD 21), the IMDB score, and the theme / mechanic / concept summary above, I think it&#8217;s going to be -very- tight for Survive (first) and Abandoned (second), with Afterlife maybe coming in third.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m right, nobody cares, even me. But, what the hell. I&#8217;ll give myself one extra beer after I submit my game if I get anywhere close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfernald</title>
		<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-60437</link>
		<dc:creator>sfernald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/?p=154465#comment-60437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Abandon&quot; all hope ye who enter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Abandon&#8221; all hope ye who enter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oreganik</title>
		<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-60427</link>
		<dc:creator>Oreganik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/?p=154465#comment-60427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, finished the numbers on LD 22. Here&#039;s my thesis:

Popular &quot;ideas&quot; make it through the voting rounds, but only &quot;themes&quot; -- not &quot;mechanics&quot; or &quot;concepts&quot; -- win the day.

Example from LD 22, sorted by place. The number is its &quot;equalized popularity&quot; (defined in the spreadsheet).
1. Alone (Theme) : 2.47
2. Randomly generated (Mechanic) : 3.12
3. Evolution (Mechanic) : 1.78
4. Parallel dimension (Concept) : 1.70
5. Forgotten places (Theme) : 1.36

Same from LD 23:
1. Tiny World (Theme) : 1.99
2. Exploration (Mechanic) : 1.80
3. Evolution (Mechanic) : 1.18
4. Survival (Concept) : 0.93
5. Minimalism (Concept) : 1.69

Based on the raw numbers alone, I can&#039;t predict a winner. But I&#039;m starting to wonder if applying qualitative values to the entries might assist in prediction...

FFS, this is a weird way to spend a Wednesday night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, finished the numbers on LD 22. Here&#8217;s my thesis:</p>
<p>Popular &#8220;ideas&#8221; make it through the voting rounds, but only &#8220;themes&#8221; &#8212; not &#8220;mechanics&#8221; or &#8220;concepts&#8221; &#8212; win the day.</p>
<p>Example from LD 22, sorted by place. The number is its &#8220;equalized popularity&#8221; (defined in the spreadsheet).<br />
1. Alone (Theme) : 2.47<br />
2. Randomly generated (Mechanic) : 3.12<br />
3. Evolution (Mechanic) : 1.78<br />
4. Parallel dimension (Concept) : 1.70<br />
5. Forgotten places (Theme) : 1.36</p>
<p>Same from LD 23:<br />
1. Tiny World (Theme) : 1.99<br />
2. Exploration (Mechanic) : 1.80<br />
3. Evolution (Mechanic) : 1.18<br />
4. Survival (Concept) : 0.93<br />
5. Minimalism (Concept) : 1.69</p>
<p>Based on the raw numbers alone, I can&#8217;t predict a winner. But I&#8217;m starting to wonder if applying qualitative values to the entries might assist in prediction&#8230;</p>
<p>FFS, this is a weird way to spend a Wednesday night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oreganik</title>
		<link>http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/2012/08/22/stats-on-theme-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-60418</link>
		<dc:creator>Oreganik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ludumdare.com/compo/?p=154465#comment-60418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I crunched the numbers on LD 23 and compared them against the results. You can see them on the same link I posted above.

If the LD 23 results are any indication, you can safely ignore these predictions. =D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I crunched the numbers on LD 23 and compared them against the results. You can see them on the same link I posted above.</p>
<p>If the LD 23 results are any indication, you can safely ignore these predictions. =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
