Comments on: Random Art Evolver

By: Wiering

Wiering — Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:08:59 +0000

Sorry about that, I accidentally used the standard player for testing instead of the debug player, I’ve fixed some things now so it should be a bit more stable.

The speed depends on what numbers are in the code (and thus what kind of graphical operations are performed, some are slower than others) and of course the length of the code (change with + and -).

Donny D: If you see something and click too late, you can press Shift+Backspace multiple (up to 100) times to get it back.

blitzgren: Thanks for the link, didn’t know that one.

By: stqn

stqn — Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:58:45 +0000

Hey, so that’s not just me … When I ran it (under Linux with the official flash plugin), it worked for a while, and then everything crashed badly. I had to shut my computer down and restart.

By: Jonny D

Jonny D — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:53:17 +0000

It goes a bit too fast, so I can’t grab the images I want at first. Then it begins to lag, presumably due to memory usage. Eventually, it locks up my browser…

I like it, though.

By: blitzgren

blitzgren — Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:48:02 +0000

Pretty cool! I’ve seen this before, a bit more academic but more complex and will also whet your evolution algorithm appetite: http://picbreeder.org/